一龍馬/AI 情報站讀懂消息背後的脈絡
星期日
搜尋

François Chollet 主張現行模型有意識的說法荒謬,強調資訊處理能力與感質、主觀經驗無關

中文摘要

他以幼兒、計算機、西洋棋引擎、自駕車與聊天機器人對比,說明高能力不代表有意識。貼文屬於哲學立場表述,未提供新的實驗證據,判讀僅限該則貼文。

一龍馬判讀

這番區分提醒政策與安全討論先釐清意識定義,避免把能力強弱直接等同道德地位。

原文節錄

François Chollet · @fchollet

Do not confuse competent information processing and sentience, they are wholly unrelated.…

取得部分原文 · 不代表內容已獨立查證

查看原文
完整收錄文字與來源

R to @fchollet: Side note. The idea that current models are conscious is absurd and downright offensive. Do not confuse competent information processing and sentience, they are wholly unrelated. You can be entirely incompetent at everything yet fully conscious, like a toddler, or extraordinarily competent in one or more domains with absolutely zero consciousness, like a calculator, a chess engine, a self-driving car, or an AI chatbot. Possessing the "circuits" for competent information processing in a given domain, whether through training or hardcoding, does not produce qualia, subjective experience, emotions, or suffering. Calculators do not "feel" arithmetic and they don't get tired or annoyed when you give them larger numbers to process. To argue otherwise is ontologically absurd. Current AI models are effectively calculators scaled to a very large number of competence circuits across many domains, etched via gradient descent.

收錄日期
2026-10-04
來源
Nitter RSS(公開貼文)
抓取時間
2026/10/04 08:14(台北)