一龍馬/AI 情報站讀懂消息背後的脈絡
星期日
搜尋

楊立昆轉貼的觀點主張人類等級 AI 仍然遙遠,數學、程式與有標準答案問答的超人表現不等於通用能力

中文摘要

該貼文以自駕與家用機器人為反例,稱 Tesla FSD 為 Level 2、Waymo 為 Level 4,並稱即使有數十億小時訓練資料,模仿學習仍練不出像 17 歲少年 20 小時學會開車的系統。由於所指的兩年前影片內容未附,判讀僅限這則轉貼文字,未能驗證其比較基準。

一龍馬判讀

對自駕與實體機器人團隊而言,這是把評估焦點從考試型基準拉回物理世界複雜度的提醒,但該貼文沒有提出新數據或方法,無法作為技術路線判斷依據。

原文節錄

Yann LeCun · @ylecun

we are still far from human-level AI.…

取得部分原文 · 不代表內容已獨立查證

查看原文
完整收錄文字與來源

RT by @ylecun: That video is 2 years old. Two years later, we are still far from human-level AI. Sure, AI has superhuman performance in a number of tasks (particularly in mathematics and coding and answering questions with known answers). But where is my Level-5 self-driving car? (Before you ask, Tesla FSD is rated Level 2, Waymo is Level 4). Where is the self-driving car that can teach itself to drive in 20 hours of practice like any 17 year old? (Before you ask, we have billions of hours of training data and still can't successfully train a self-driving system by imitation learning) Where is my domestic robot? Where is the robot that can do what any 8 year-old child can do? Where is the robot that can learn a new task as quickly as an 8 year old? AI still has a hard time with the complexity and messiness of the physical world.

收錄日期
2026-10-04
來源
Nitter RSS(公開貼文)
抓取時間
2026/10/04 08:14(台北)